Is it possible (did you try...) to put the production-chain in a/yours cloud?
This must be the most interesting talk ever done by lawyers to a software audience. Great stuff!
what about including figures / graphs ?
LaTEX was escluded?
Is the demo already available online?
Thank you Carlo and Alberto
Thanks, great talk!!
Welcome to the Track 5: "Legal" If you have any questions for the speaker, please post it while the speaker is talking, so we can to make it at the end of his talk (in case there is still time). For more questions and discussion you can also use St. Virtual our digital village. Enjoy the talks and the conference!
Carlo Piana has also a table in S. Virtual: https://virtual.noi.bz.it/users.html#group=kulturhaus-casacultura
If you want to continue the discussion there, please feel free to do so!
There are concrete legislative reform proposals you could point out?
We like to remind you, if you have any questions for the speaker, please post it while the speaker is talking, so we can to make it at the end of his talk (in case there is still time), thanks!
Elisa, we did a nice Scratch project, called Tacitus, in the University of Bolzano some years ago with kids from primary and elementary schools. Please have a look at http://tacitus.mystrikingly.com/.
How to develop critical thinking on students against marketing strategies from big corps against Open Source?
I agree with Alex that schools should be speaking more about the GAFA(M) firms. It is a pity that this hadn't been done till now.
Interesting conversation. Left with some mixed feelings. Hope we can have such an IRL conversation on-stage next year at SFScon!
If you have any questions for the speaker, please post it while the speaker is talking, so we can to make it at the end of the talk (in case there is still time), thanks!
Hi Lukas,
are there brands of routers / (and fc modems) on the market featuring free software OS (not proprietary blackbox firmware) ?
Are soft and hard barriers illegal and if not is there work towards that?
Philippe, do you have a link to the study?
If a package is LGPL, doesn't that mean that all it's dependencies are compatible with it?
Henrik: the study is at https://github.com/clearlydefined/license-score/raw/master/ClearlyDefined%20-%20ClearlyLicensed%20clarity%20report-2019.pdf
Mattia:
re:
> If a package is LGPL, doesn't that mean that all it's dependencies are compatible with it?
It would be great if it would be true, but the fact a package is LGPL does not mean that the author of this package did check the license of all its direct and indirect dependencies.
Hi Philippe, as we use ScanCode to feed our market readiness index, we could be interested in integrating the license score you just mentioned. Pls keep us posted.
And, Philippe, thank you for ScanCode, great work, we love it!
Cédric:
I will drop you a note for sure. The latest version of scancode has a this --license-score option to compute the license clarity score https://scancode-toolkit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cli-reference/scan-options-post.html#license-clarity-score-option
@Giammi: the howdyadoc demo we presented this morning is available (as a gitlab repo) at https://gitlab.justice4all.it/howdyadoc-demo/apache20
The toolchain is available at https://gitlab.com/howdyadoc/toolchain/
How would the output (e.g. some machine learning model derived from some data) of an AI/ML tool be different (legally) from the output of a compiler like GNU GCC (e.g. some binary derived from some source code?)
Thank you++ for this excellent org and venue!
Many thanks and congratulations to everyone involved in the excellent organization!
Thank you Patrick and the team for a great SFScon. See you IRL in 2021!
Comments