Digital Independence Day

Digital Sovereignty Is Not a Technology Problem

What We Learned From Building a Real Alternative to Big Tech

Auditorium (A2)

12:0035 mins14/11/2026

For years, the Free Software movement believed that digital sovereignty was mainly a technological challenge. Give people Linux, give them open source tools, give them self-hosted infrastructure: and they will be free. Yet despite decades of Free Software, billions of people remain dependent on proprietary platforms built on surveillance and lock-in.
Our experience taught us something different.
EXIT (3x1t.org) is a non-profit community in northern Italy that has been working for over a decade to promote practical digital sovereignty. We do not just advocate for Free Software: we help people migrate to it. We install GNU/Linux on their laptops and LineageOS on their phones. We provide self-hosted email, encrypted chat (XMPP/Matrix), cloud storage and collaboration tools: all on our own servers, with no data exported to third parties, no monetization, no advertising.
But over the years, we discovered something unexpected: technology alone changes nothing.
Even when we offer a fully functional, privacy-respecting alternative to Gmail, WhatsApp or Google Drive, most people do not switch. Not because the tools are inferior: but because the barriers are social, psychological and cultural. People fear losing convenience. They fear being seen as “difficult” by colleagues. They lack the digital literacy to evaluate the risks of surveillance-based platforms. And they lack the trust in alternative providers: even when those providers are their own community.
This talk will present the real-world experience of EXIT: what works, what does not, and what it actually takes to help ordinary people regain control over their digital lives.
We will discuss:
• Why awareness campaigns fail: most people already know Big Tech is problematic. Knowing is not enough.
• The hidden cost of convenience: how proprietary ecosystems exploit human psychology, not just technical lock-in.
• Building communities of trust: the key ingredient that makes digital sovereignty sustainable at a local level.
• Practical strategies: from public workshops and school programs to self-hosted infrastructure that non-technical users can actually manage.
• The role of Free Software: necessary but not sufficient. Sovereignty requires literacy, community and emotional safety, not just a kernel and a package manager.
We will share both successes and failures. The workshop format that attracted 80 people. The server that crashed at the worst possible moment. The user who refused to leave WhatsApp because “everyone is there”: and how we finally helped her leave.
Our conclusion is both hopeful and humbling: digital sovereignty is not primarily about software freedom. It is about enabling people to understand, choose and control the technologies that shape their lives. Free Software is the foundation, but without awareness, community and digital literacy, people remain dependent: even when free alternatives are available.
This talk is for anyone who believes that technology should serve people, not the other way around. It is for developers who write Free Software and wonder why adoption is slow. It is for activists who fight surveillance capitalism and need stories that resonate beyond the converted. And it is for decision-makers who want to understand what real digital sovereignty looks like: not in theory, but in practice.

Supported by